1966 Nissan Cedric vs. 1987 Zastava Yugo
To start off, 1987 Zastava Yugo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1987 Zastava Yugo. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1987 Zastava Yugo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 340 kg more than 1987 Zastava Yugo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Zastava Yugo. (108 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1966 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Zastava Yugo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Nissan Cedric | 1987 Zastava Yugo | |
| Make | Nissan | Zastava |
| Model | Cedric | Yugo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1372 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |
