1966 Nissan Cedric vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 75 (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rover 75 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1966 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Rover 75 (300 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2004 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Nissan Cedric | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | Cedric | 75 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2630 mm |