1966 Nissan Cedric vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2004 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1023 kg more than 1966 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (427 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Nissan Cedric | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Cedric | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 2313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3100 mm |
