1966 Nissan Cedric vs. 2006 Volvo S80
To start off, 2006 Volvo S80 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S80 (138 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo S80 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1966 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo S80 (220 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Nissan Cedric | 2006 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Cedric | S80 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2800 mm |