1966 Nissan Cedric vs. 2007 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2007 Toyota Highlander is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,362 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Toyota Highlander (155 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Toyota Highlander weights approximately 65 kg more than 1966 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Toyota Highlander (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2007 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Nissan Cedric | 2007 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Cedric | Highlander |
Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2362 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2720 mm |