1966 Nissan Cedric vs. 2007 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2007 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Volkswagen Polo (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 116 kg more than 2007 Volkswagen Polo.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Volkswagen Polo (310 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2007 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Nissan Cedric | 2007 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Nissan | Volkswagen |
Model | Cedric | Polo |
Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1174 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2470 mm |