1966 Nissan Cedric vs. 2008 Tata Nano
To start off, 2008 Tata Nano is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2008 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2008 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 690 kg more than 2008 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Nissan Cedric | 2008 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Nissan | Tata |
| Model | Cedric | Nano |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2230 mm |
