1966 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 246 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Cedric | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
