1966 Nissan Cedric vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Nissan Cedric | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Nissan | Jaguar |
| Model | Cedric | XF |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 237 HP |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 500 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2908 mm |
