1966 NSU 1000 vs. 1985 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1985 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1966 NSU 1000. (53 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 1966 NSU 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 495 kg more than 1966 NSU 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 NSU 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 NSU 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 NSU 1000 | 1985 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | NSU | Plymouth |
| Model | 1000 | Sundance |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1084 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2470 mm |
