1966 NSU 1000 vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1966 NSU 1000. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1966 NSU 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Colorado (207 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 NSU 1000. (80 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 NSU 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 NSU 1000 | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | NSU | Holden |
| Model | 1000 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1084 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 80 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
