1966 NSU 1000 vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1966 NSU 1000. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1966 NSU 1000.
Because 1966 NSU 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 NSU 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 NSU 1000. (80 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 NSU 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 NSU 1000 | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | NSU | Holden |
Model | 1000 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1084 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 80 Nm | 176 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2685 mm |