1966 NSU 1000 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 NSU 1000 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 690 kg more than 1966 NSU 1000.
Because 1966 NSU 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 NSU 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 NSU 1000. (71 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 NSU 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1966 NSU 1000 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | NSU | Mini |
Model | 1000 | Countryman |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 47 L |