1966 NSU Prinz vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 NSU Prinz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 NSU Prinz would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1966 NSU Prinz. (30 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1966 NSU Prinz.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 NSU Prinz. (42 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 NSU Prinz.
Compare all specifications:
1966 NSU Prinz | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | NSU | Nissan |
Model | Prinz | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 583 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 30 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 42 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3570 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 65 L |