1966 NSU Wankel Spider vs. 2010 Audi A5
To start off, 2010 Audi A5 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 NSU Wankel Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 NSU Wankel Spider would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Audi A5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A5 (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1966 NSU Wankel Spider. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1966 NSU Wankel Spider.
Because 1966 NSU Wankel Spider is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 NSU Wankel Spider. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A5 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 NSU Wankel Spider. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 NSU Wankel Spider.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 NSU Wankel Spider | 2010 Audi A5 | |
| Make | NSU | Audi |
| Model | Wankel Spider | A5 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 497 cc | 1968 cc |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 67 L |
