1966 NSU Wankel Spider vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 NSU Wankel Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 NSU Wankel Spider would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1966 NSU Wankel Spider. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1966 NSU Wankel Spider.
Because 1966 NSU Wankel Spider is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 NSU Wankel Spider. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 NSU Wankel Spider. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 NSU Wankel Spider.
Compare all specifications:
1966 NSU Wankel Spider | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | NSU | Ford |
Model | Wankel Spider | E-350 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 497 cc | 5400 cc |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3590 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 57 L |