1966 NSU Wankel Spider vs. 2011 Audi TT
To start off, 2011 Audi TT is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 NSU Wankel Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 NSU Wankel Spider would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi TT (158 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1966 NSU Wankel Spider. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1966 NSU Wankel Spider.
Because 1966 NSU Wankel Spider is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 NSU Wankel Spider. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi TT (250 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 NSU Wankel Spider. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 NSU Wankel Spider.
Compare all specifications:
1966 NSU Wankel Spider | 2011 Audi TT | |
Make | NSU | Audi |
Model | Wankel Spider | TT |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 497 cc | 1800 cc |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3590 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 60 L |