1966 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 1989 Saab 9000
To start off, 1989 Saab 9000 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 370 kg more than 1989 Saab 9000.
Because 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire | 1989 Saab 9000 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Saab |
| Model | Starfire | 9000 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6965 cc | 2290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1450 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5370 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2670 mm |
