1966 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 1998 Volvo S80

To start off, 1998 Volvo S80 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 166 kg more than 1998 Volvo S80.

Because 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Oldsmobile Starfire 1998 Volvo S80
Make Oldsmobile Volvo
Model Starfire S80
Year Released 1966 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6965 cc 2461 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 138 HP
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1820 kg 1654 kg
Vehicle Length 5370 mm 4830 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 3130 mm 2670 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]