1966 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 2009 Saturn Aura
To start off, 2009 Saturn Aura is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 488 kg more than 2009 Saturn Aura.
Because 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Aura, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Oldsmobile Starfire | 2009 Saturn Aura | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Saturn |
| Model | Starfire | Aura |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6965 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 164 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1332 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5370 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2860 mm |
