1966 Opel Rekord vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 4,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1966 Opel Rekord. (89 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1966 Opel Rekord. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Opel Rekord weights approximately 142 kg more than 2002 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Opel Rekord. (149 Nm). This means 2002 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Opel Rekord.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Opel Rekord | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Opel | Toyota |
| Model | Rekord | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 923 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |
