1966 Opel Rekord vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1966 Opel Rekord. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1966 Opel Rekord.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Opel Rekord. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Opel Rekord. (105 Nm). This means 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Opel Rekord.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Opel Rekord | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Opel | Citroen |
| Model | Rekord | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1490 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
