1966 Opel Rekord vs. 2013 Ford Flex
To start off, 2013 Ford Flex is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Flex (281 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1966 Opel Rekord. (89 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1966 Opel Rekord. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Flex weights approximately 963 kg more than 1966 Opel Rekord. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Flex (346 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Opel Rekord. (149 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Opel Rekord.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Opel Rekord | 2013 Ford Flex | |
Make | Opel | Ford |
Model | Rekord | Flex |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 346 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1065 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2256 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1726 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2994 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |