1966 Peugeot 204 vs. 1999 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 1999 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Peugeot 204. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Peugeot 204 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Seat Inca Kombi (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1966 Peugeot 204. (47 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Seat Inca Kombi should accelerate faster than 1966 Peugeot 204. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 155 kg more than 1966 Peugeot 204. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Peugeot 204. (84 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Peugeot 204.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Peugeot 204 | 1999 Seat Inca Kombi | |
| Make | Peugeot | Seat |
| Model | 204 | Inca Kombi |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1129 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1035 kg |
