1966 Peugeot 404 vs. 2000 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2000 Smart ForTwo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Peugeot 404. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Peugeot 404 would be higher. At 1,468 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Peugeot 404 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Smart ForTwo (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1966 Peugeot 404. (55 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1966 Peugeot 404. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Peugeot 404 weights approximately 301 kg more than 2000 Smart ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Peugeot 404 | 2000 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Peugeot | Smart |
| Model | 404 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1468 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1116 kg | 815 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 33 L |
