1966 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2002 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2002 Subaru Outback is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Subaru Outback (154 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1966 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1966 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 2002 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Plymouth Valiant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Plymouth Valiant | 2002 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Plymouth | Subaru |
| Model | Valiant | Outback |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2789 cc | 2457 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |
