1966 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2006 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2006 Toyota RunX is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Plymouth Valiant (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2006 Toyota RunX. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Plymouth Valiant should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota RunX.
Because 1966 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Plymouth Valiant | 2006 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Plymouth | Toyota |
Model | Valiant | RunX |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2789 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |