1966 Renault 4 vs. 1989 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1989 Toyota Celica is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Toyota Celica (201 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Toyota Celica weights approximately 870 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Renault 4 | 1989 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 4 | Celica |
Year Released | 1966 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |