1966 Renault 4 vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (160 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo C70 weights approximately 750 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Renault 4 | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Renault | Volvo |
| Model | 4 | C70 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |
