1966 Renault 4 vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 223 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Renault 4 | 2006 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Renault | Rover |
| Model | 4 | 75 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 256 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 13.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 65 L |
