1966 Renault 4 vs. 2006 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2006 Toyota Tundra is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Tundra (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 705 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Renault 4 | 2006 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | 4 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 236 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 100 L |