1966 Renault 4 vs. 2010 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2010 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Daewoo Rezzo (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 697 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Renault 4 | 2010 Daewoo Rezzo | |
| Make | Renault | Daewoo |
| Model | 4 | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 103 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1347 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 8.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |
