1966 Renault 4 vs. 2013 BMW X5
To start off, 2013 BMW X5 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X5 (296 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X5 weights approximately 1600 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Renault 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Renault 4 | 2013 BMW X5 | |
| Make | Renault | BMW |
| Model | 4 | X5 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 2996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 2250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4857 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2197 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1776 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2933 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 85 L |
