1966 Renault Dauphine vs. 2010 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2010 GMC Yukon is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault Dauphine would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Yukon (332 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 294 more horse power than 1966 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault Dauphine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Yukon weights approximately 2060 kg more than 1966 Renault Dauphine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Yukon (497 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 439 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Renault Dauphine. (58 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Renault Dauphine | 2010 GMC Yukon | |
| Make | Renault | GMC |
| Model | Dauphine | Yukon |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 845 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 332 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 58 Nm | 497 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 632 kg | 2692 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 5131 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2007 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1953 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2946 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 91 L |
