1966 Renault Dauphine vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault Dauphine would be higher. At 2,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (200 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1966 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault Dauphine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 943 kg more than 1966 Renault Dauphine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Renault Dauphine | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
| Make | Renault | Kia |
| Model | Dauphine | Cadenza |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 845 cc | 2700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 632 kg | 1575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 4965 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2280 mm | 2845 mm |
