1966 Renault Floride vs. 2012 Ford Ka
To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault Floride. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault Floride would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Renault Floride is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Renault Floride. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Ford Ka has automatic transmission and 1966 Renault Floride has manual transmission. 1966 Renault Floride will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford Ka will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Renault Floride | 2012 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Renault | Ford |
| Model | Floride | Ka |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1106 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2450 mm |
