1966 Riley Kestrel vs. 1987 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 1987 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Riley Kestrel (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1987 Volkswagen Polo. (44 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1987 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 115 kg more than 1987 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Volkswagen Polo (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1987 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Riley Kestrel 1987 Volkswagen Polo
Make Riley Volkswagen
Model Kestrel Polo
Year Released 1966 1987
Engine Size 1098 cc 1043 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 53 HP 44 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 83 Nm 96 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 885 kg 770 kg
Vehicle Length 3730 mm 3660 mm
Vehicle Width 1540 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2380 mm 2340 mm