1966 Riley Kestrel vs. 1995 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 1995 Suzuki Swift is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Suzuki Swift is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Suzuki Swift (66 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Suzuki Swift should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 55 kg more than 1995 Suzuki Swift.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Suzuki Swift (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1995 Suzuki Swift will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Riley Kestrel | 1995 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Riley | Suzuki |
Model | Kestrel | Swift |
Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 40 L |