1966 Riley Kestrel vs. 2002 Volkswagen Golf
To start off, 2002 Volkswagen Golf is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Volkswagen Golf is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volkswagen Golf (180 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volkswagen Golf should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volkswagen Golf weights approximately 501 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volkswagen Golf (236 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm). This means 2002 Volkswagen Golf will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Riley Kestrel | 2002 Volkswagen Golf | |
Make | Riley | Volkswagen |
Model | Kestrel | Golf |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 236 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 1386 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 55 L |