1966 Riley Kestrel vs. 2009 Volvo S60
To start off, 2009 Volvo S60 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S60 (258 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S60 (350 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Riley Kestrel | 2009 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Riley | Volvo |
Model | Kestrel | S60 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 258 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 18.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 68 L |