1966 Riley Kestrel vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford C-Max (95 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 665 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford C-Max (230 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 147 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Riley Kestrel | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Riley | Ford |
| Model | Kestrel | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2788 mm |
