1966 Riley Kestrel vs. 2010 Ford S-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford S-Max is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford S-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford S-Max (202 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford S-Max should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Riley Kestrel | 2010 Ford S-Max | |
Make | Riley | Ford |
Model | Kestrel | S-Max |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 202 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |