1966 Riley Kestrel vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1655 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2011 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Riley Kestrel | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Riley | Fisker |
| Model | Kestrel | Karma |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 36 L |
