1966 Riley Kestrel vs. 2011 Honda Civic
To start off, 2011 Honda Civic is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda Civic (198 HP) has 145 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Honda Civic weights approximately 382 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda Civic (193 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm). This means 2011 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Riley Kestrel | 2011 Honda Civic | |
| Make | Riley | Honda |
| Model | Kestrel | Civic |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 198 HP |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 193 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 11:01 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 1267 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4276 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1785 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1445 mm |
