1966 Riley Kestrel vs. 2011 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2011 Jaguar XF is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 218 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2011 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 517 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm). This means 2011 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Riley Kestrel | 2011 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Riley | Jaguar |
| Model | Kestrel | XF |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 70 L |
