1966 Riley Kestrel vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 828 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Riley Kestrel | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Riley | Chevrolet |
| Model | Kestrel | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 1713 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4771 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2857 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 71 L |
