1966 Riley Kestrel vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost weights approximately 1610 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost (780 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 697 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Riley Kestrel | 2013 Rolls-Royce Ghost | |
| Make | Riley | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Kestrel | Ghost |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 83 Nm | 780 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 885 kg | 2495 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 5569 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1948 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3465 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 82 L |
