1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. Both 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud and 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud are equipped with a 6,230 cc engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Silver Cloud | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 1966 | 1964 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6230 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 187 km/hour | 187 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 81 L |