1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2002 Toyota Pod
To start off, 2002 Toyota Pod is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 1160 kg more than 2002 Toyota Pod.
Because 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Pod, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2002 Toyota Pod | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Toyota |
| Model | Silver Cloud | Pod |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 194 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 48 L |
