1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud vs. 2006 Toyota Fortuner
To start off, 2006 Toyota Fortuner is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 890 kg more than 2006 Toyota Fortuner.
Because 2006 Toyota Fortuner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Fortuner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | 2006 Toyota Fortuner | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Toyota |
| Model | Silver Cloud | Fortuner |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6230 cc | 3956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 65 L |
